>>528562680
Why yes, Stewie. In fact, it's not just possible, it's entirely likely. Ya see, Stewie, the notion that incest produces defective children is based upon cultural prejudices dated back centuries, millennia even. "But Peter," you ask, "surely doctors and geneticists wouldn't *lie* to us about incest being bad, would they?" You'd be amazed at how incestuous the medical community is, Stewie. Thing is, nobody wants to do the proper research on a "solved problem," there's no profit in that, so if the results of the scientific journals they cite are faulty due to bad or biased research, nobody is going to question the validity of it when at best it would encourage behavior they personally find reprehensible.
>>528563172
I feel safer in a trailer park than any given neighborhood in Chicago that doesn't have gates.