Search Results
7/16/2025, 5:29:14 PM
>>81850555
You know what's funny about all this? You could bring a radical feminist in here and she would very likely agree with me, only from a different perspective.
She would argue that they never wanted any of this and they were dragged along and forced into an evolutionary timeline that doesn't feel right for them. Of course she wouldn't spell out that it's their flaw, she wouldn't even admit that it's a flaw that their mammal nature yearns to rubberband back into the stone age, but she would agree that they can not, under any circumstance, be at peace with men and it's something that comes from deep down not because of actual lived experience.
They even go as far as to make up mythology around this shit to fabricate some sort of moral high ground on their end, the female mystique garbage, the divine feminine, the mockery of you being "incomplete", a mutant, those kinds of things, but all that aside, they will agree that this conflict goes way beyond things that happened to them, it's primal instinct and they won't even deny that.
The only people who categorically reject this idea without even exploring the patterns are men who can't cope with the idea that their romanticized idea of an "other half" might simply not exist.
>women did not have rights.
>Its literally required to have a functioning society
The problem is that this never lasts because the natural resentment is one-sided.
Men eventually become sympathetic to women because they never had any evolutionary pressure to contain this, they never actually fought women, they never had foreign female cells in their bodies that their immune systems recognized as foreign so they never developed this kind of underlying, inexplicable pathological hatred.
It's always the same cycle over and over again, they break free of containment and the superorganic autoimmune disease gets to work until it's met by yet another patriarchal revival, not even to defend themselves, but to "save women from themselves".
You know what's funny about all this? You could bring a radical feminist in here and she would very likely agree with me, only from a different perspective.
She would argue that they never wanted any of this and they were dragged along and forced into an evolutionary timeline that doesn't feel right for them. Of course she wouldn't spell out that it's their flaw, she wouldn't even admit that it's a flaw that their mammal nature yearns to rubberband back into the stone age, but she would agree that they can not, under any circumstance, be at peace with men and it's something that comes from deep down not because of actual lived experience.
They even go as far as to make up mythology around this shit to fabricate some sort of moral high ground on their end, the female mystique garbage, the divine feminine, the mockery of you being "incomplete", a mutant, those kinds of things, but all that aside, they will agree that this conflict goes way beyond things that happened to them, it's primal instinct and they won't even deny that.
The only people who categorically reject this idea without even exploring the patterns are men who can't cope with the idea that their romanticized idea of an "other half" might simply not exist.
>women did not have rights.
>Its literally required to have a functioning society
The problem is that this never lasts because the natural resentment is one-sided.
Men eventually become sympathetic to women because they never had any evolutionary pressure to contain this, they never actually fought women, they never had foreign female cells in their bodies that their immune systems recognized as foreign so they never developed this kind of underlying, inexplicable pathological hatred.
It's always the same cycle over and over again, they break free of containment and the superorganic autoimmune disease gets to work until it's met by yet another patriarchal revival, not even to defend themselves, but to "save women from themselves".
Page 1