Search Results
7/9/2025, 3:10:51 AM
>>509881420
>>509878832
>>509881726
>Roman fathers held vitae necisque potestas
In reality, YOU are not Roman. All Europeans are.
>>509878832
>>509881726
>Roman fathers held vitae necisque potestas
In reality, YOU are not Roman. All Europeans are.
6/26/2025, 1:26:03 PM
>>508776216
Yes but that's just a consequence of how it had to come about. The concept of the 'principate' and 'dominate' periods is being thrown out, becuase there were absolute rulers in the so-called principate period and republican-like rulers in the dominate period.
That's what happens because the imperial cult was a derivative of private and patriarchal aristocratic cult. I enforce aristocratic cult before pure kingship. The latter derives from the former and allows true Roman excellence.
Romulus left such a strong impression that any revival of Romanitas was necessarily seen as the adventus of the original numen of the sacred founder.
The thing about Roman republicanism is that it is nothing like American republicanism, which is just a freemasonic mockery.
Roman republicanism had aristocracy in the senate. A Greek who at first was skeptical of the Romans as being simplistic, ultimately saw in the Senate an assembly of kings.
So our conception of republicanism itself must be re-evaluated.
It makes the accomplishments of Augustus and Caesar even more dramatic, coming to the fore of an assembly of such powerful men. Caesar was not the only one trying to affirm this sort of divine rulership. But he won.
I am not advocating for absolute monarchies except in some situations where it is necessary, like Hitler. For instance charles II's dissolution of parliament after banker jews used it to kill his dad. In that sense it is justified. I am usually in favour of an aristocracy under the king.
Senate derives from senex meaning 'wise old man'. It was an assembly of divine elders in a highly patriarchal environment where the father represents the gods.
In America, black women with lazy eyes meet with Trump.
I used to say the American senate was a tribunus plebis. Acutally, no it was more akin to a tribunus dēpulsōrum. A tribune of pariahs. a revolving door for men of no birth and no fathers. Sometimes not even men.
So let's not consider all republics equal
Yes but that's just a consequence of how it had to come about. The concept of the 'principate' and 'dominate' periods is being thrown out, becuase there were absolute rulers in the so-called principate period and republican-like rulers in the dominate period.
That's what happens because the imperial cult was a derivative of private and patriarchal aristocratic cult. I enforce aristocratic cult before pure kingship. The latter derives from the former and allows true Roman excellence.
Romulus left such a strong impression that any revival of Romanitas was necessarily seen as the adventus of the original numen of the sacred founder.
The thing about Roman republicanism is that it is nothing like American republicanism, which is just a freemasonic mockery.
Roman republicanism had aristocracy in the senate. A Greek who at first was skeptical of the Romans as being simplistic, ultimately saw in the Senate an assembly of kings.
So our conception of republicanism itself must be re-evaluated.
It makes the accomplishments of Augustus and Caesar even more dramatic, coming to the fore of an assembly of such powerful men. Caesar was not the only one trying to affirm this sort of divine rulership. But he won.
I am not advocating for absolute monarchies except in some situations where it is necessary, like Hitler. For instance charles II's dissolution of parliament after banker jews used it to kill his dad. In that sense it is justified. I am usually in favour of an aristocracy under the king.
Senate derives from senex meaning 'wise old man'. It was an assembly of divine elders in a highly patriarchal environment where the father represents the gods.
In America, black women with lazy eyes meet with Trump.
I used to say the American senate was a tribunus plebis. Acutally, no it was more akin to a tribunus dēpulsōrum. A tribune of pariahs. a revolving door for men of no birth and no fathers. Sometimes not even men.
So let's not consider all republics equal
Page 1