>>509892136This touches, whether knowingly or not, upon a deep perversion within the Abrahamic schema: namely, the subversion of the traditional sacrificial king into a sentimentalised son-victim, preserved and glorified through no virile devotio or martial apotheosis, but the hystericised suffering of the innocent. In Rome, the king, or rex, could become divine only in conquest or ritual death freely embraced; do ut des between man and god (I give that you give) head held high before the fire. Yet in the Christian mythos, this passage is usurped by one who does not reign, who does not avenge, who bleeds but does not strike exalted for submission, wept over like a slain child in the arms of the cosmic mother.
The resurrection, far from fulfilling the ancient rite of return, becomes an anti-imperial gesture: a return without wrath, without sword, without glory; feminised, spiritualised, stripped of command. Thus the king becomes the martyr, and the martyr becomes the god: without auctoritas, in the inverted womb of collective guilt and eternal childhood. This is the Abrahamic matriarch: the priesthood of pity, the monarchy of the mourner, the elevation of the broken as sacred.
The sacramentum oath of the Roman legionary was perverted by the medieval knight. Marianism, by enthroning woman as sorrowing mother of the victim-king, laid the spiritual groundwork for chivalry (tradcuck). A creed wherein men abase themselves before the tearful Virgin, not glorying before the goddess of victory; whose sanctity is measured by suffering, not sovereignty.
The messianic complex of Abrahamism, exalting the redeemer as sacrificed son, engenders in man a pathological yearning to save the feminine, not command her; and thus the suffragette arises not against Christian morality, but as its inevitable fruit. She who screams for rights does so in the tongue of the crucified, the castrated. It is from this that men are nagged to death, inheriting the mother complex of Jews.
KEK
