>>509890800
Yes I read it years ago. And I have an opinion. Regardless of if it's real or not, it repreesents something important to right wing discourse. The Oera Linda text, in its exaltation of a so-called 'mother' religion, with its chronicled line of priestess-rulers and its emphasis on feminine governance and folkish moralism, promotes what is unmistakably a matriarchal mythos.
From a Roman pagan traditionalist perspective, this is not a mark of primacy but of regression: an inversion of the divine order wherein paterfamilias, imperium, and the sacral masculinity of the rex sacrorum were once held as the axis of cosmos and polity. As opposed to the fatherland it posits the motherland. This is a constant problem with the right traditionalist revivals. The matriarchal impulse is the earthy impulse, opposed to the celestial and uranic forces of the patriarchal powers that organise the State.
The broader Celtic and Germanic religions had their glory, but it is too far remote and lacking records. Where they could, the patches were filled in with Roman syncretism. Whereas the very institutions, legal code and iconography of Rome all exist and could be revived tomorrow if enough men willed it. Many continued on in Christianised, and therefore compromised form. That is why I stress patriarchy.
I spoke to an Italian man about this. Rome had subversives trying to introduce a 'goddess cult' of varying kinds, that were always derided and pushed off to the fringe. With Christianity we won.
We have to oppose the matriarchal with the patriarchal solar energies:
>>509890805
Those are the only ones that are life generating, it was recognised in the cult of Mars and Hercules.
4chan Search
2 results for "b718667f01434d1c5875b20a647dcb4a"
>>509740048
You need to understand nuance. Just because one thing happened doesn;'t mean it was widespread. I know what you are talking about.
It was not widespread, it was a small cult in rome called the Magna Matter at the temple of Cybele. The Romans derided these men as 'semivir' (half men) and mocked them.
Rome actually has a long history of weird matriarchal cults popping up in the underground, and with Christianity, it won.
but that does not undermine the order that they fought for. They kicked out their king because he was one of these cultists.
It is a very old tale of the reinstitution of sovereignty.
You are presently under a magna mater death cult that elevates plebeians and women. They need to be kicked out. If you are willing to stop the pilpul.
You may present Christianity as solving degeneracy, but no, it was a lunar feminist cult that appealed to women and plebeians. Romans were the national descendants of Mars, the male god of war. The emperor was depicted as Mars. They were so patriarchal they would make a muslim shit and scream.
You need to understand nuance. Just because one thing happened doesn;'t mean it was widespread. I know what you are talking about.
It was not widespread, it was a small cult in rome called the Magna Matter at the temple of Cybele. The Romans derided these men as 'semivir' (half men) and mocked them.
Rome actually has a long history of weird matriarchal cults popping up in the underground, and with Christianity, it won.
but that does not undermine the order that they fought for. They kicked out their king because he was one of these cultists.
It is a very old tale of the reinstitution of sovereignty.
You are presently under a magna mater death cult that elevates plebeians and women. They need to be kicked out. If you are willing to stop the pilpul.
You may present Christianity as solving degeneracy, but no, it was a lunar feminist cult that appealed to women and plebeians. Romans were the national descendants of Mars, the male god of war. The emperor was depicted as Mars. They were so patriarchal they would make a muslim shit and scream.