>>17775507
>i'm pretty sure continuing to reply after this would be a waste of our time
Anon, your posts have so far been inundated, saturated with so much pilpul, that there is no point in trying to have a good faith dialogue, although I would theoretically always be open to one. Looking at your first sentence in your most recent post however, that seems to not be possible. At this point, all your posts are good for is springboards from which I can post the truth for others to see.