Search Results
6/18/2025, 7:44:49 AM
>>81528863
>What's really reductionist is your perspective on what I'm saying
Yes, as a steelman improvement.
>I'm not even advocating for suffering for the sake of suffering, it's merely that you cannot transcend what you refuse to acknowledge.
>The only time suffering doesn't make you stronger is when you refuse to confront it.
That's the thing. You're pampered if you have enough mental room to try processing the meta of having a decision. The Jungian and Nietzschean way are to waste the privilege of such space by building narrative barricades that fundamentally would never hold water under any real trial that couldn't care less about the opioid cope, and the next step of the approaches are to obsessively avoid ever truly testing the constructs the self-agency is delegated to. Grandiosity is a significant mechanism here.
>It feels like you're projecting your own experience of the lack of suffering.
The lack is in anyone per the necessarily inherent No True Scotsman approach involved, and the inevitable projection nature of any expression whatsoever doesn't mean an expression is wrong.
>What's really reductionist is your perspective on what I'm saying
Yes, as a steelman improvement.
>I'm not even advocating for suffering for the sake of suffering, it's merely that you cannot transcend what you refuse to acknowledge.
>The only time suffering doesn't make you stronger is when you refuse to confront it.
That's the thing. You're pampered if you have enough mental room to try processing the meta of having a decision. The Jungian and Nietzschean way are to waste the privilege of such space by building narrative barricades that fundamentally would never hold water under any real trial that couldn't care less about the opioid cope, and the next step of the approaches are to obsessively avoid ever truly testing the constructs the self-agency is delegated to. Grandiosity is a significant mechanism here.
>It feels like you're projecting your own experience of the lack of suffering.
The lack is in anyone per the necessarily inherent No True Scotsman approach involved, and the inevitable projection nature of any expression whatsoever doesn't mean an expression is wrong.
Page 1