>>510752954
no, what happened is that the reporter was preparing an article in advance, which would be her story after Harris announced her running mate; something which was going to happen (I think) about a week later.

It was her draft copy, but it accidently got transferred to the live web. them calling it 'fake' is them saying 'it's fake because it's not the final article I put out'; which bypasses the obvious problem that they had started with an editorial decision (the pick is perfect), before the facts (knowing who it was)

Back on the wanting it to be true, reminds me of this one, where two women wearing the same dress have different meanings, to the same author, one week apart