Search Results
7/17/2025, 8:56:24 AM
Boomers never experienced this.
7/2/2025, 12:12:51 AM
Men can't create, only consume. Both in all of History and all of nature.
A fundamental thing about men is that they are consumers. That is their self, their mentality and their relation to the world in every aspect of their existence.
Everything they write about capitalism and consumerist culture— the trend towards commodifying everything, consuming more than one needs, valuing material goods over intangible goods such as human relations, seeing everything as disposable—can easily be repurposed as a critique of men and the male psyche.
When your primary self is that of a consumer, you are always dependent on somebody else, outside of you, a producer. There is no security of self to be found when you depend on another organism. Women feel this insecurity with regards to their social self and status, their man-made dependency; men feel this insecurity with regards to their biological self and status, much more deeply and humiliatingly, which is exteriorised as hatred.
Women’s lack of self-security and solidity is artificial, social, man-made, and we can feel it, hence why women fight in a positive way, creating social change. Men’s is biological, deep-rooted, immutable, and they can feel it, hence why they fight in a negative way, by destroying themselves, other men, women, the world.
Men wish they were the producers, godlike, generators of life, hence all of their transparently covetous myths and male deities. But paradoxically, their nature as consumers devalues anything that produces and isn’t a fellow parasite—this is shown in the contempt with which they call women fields to be ploughed, or their lack of concern for land and the Earth which are always coded as female (as Sherry Ortner said, “female is to male as nature is to culture”). Almost every story they produce proves that their masculine ideal is not actually the Creator, but the Raider (summum of manliness: viking, pirate, conquistador, military).
A fundamental thing about men is that they are consumers. That is their self, their mentality and their relation to the world in every aspect of their existence.
Everything they write about capitalism and consumerist culture— the trend towards commodifying everything, consuming more than one needs, valuing material goods over intangible goods such as human relations, seeing everything as disposable—can easily be repurposed as a critique of men and the male psyche.
When your primary self is that of a consumer, you are always dependent on somebody else, outside of you, a producer. There is no security of self to be found when you depend on another organism. Women feel this insecurity with regards to their social self and status, their man-made dependency; men feel this insecurity with regards to their biological self and status, much more deeply and humiliatingly, which is exteriorised as hatred.
Women’s lack of self-security and solidity is artificial, social, man-made, and we can feel it, hence why women fight in a positive way, creating social change. Men’s is biological, deep-rooted, immutable, and they can feel it, hence why they fight in a negative way, by destroying themselves, other men, women, the world.
Men wish they were the producers, godlike, generators of life, hence all of their transparently covetous myths and male deities. But paradoxically, their nature as consumers devalues anything that produces and isn’t a fellow parasite—this is shown in the contempt with which they call women fields to be ploughed, or their lack of concern for land and the Earth which are always coded as female (as Sherry Ortner said, “female is to male as nature is to culture”). Almost every story they produce proves that their masculine ideal is not actually the Creator, but the Raider (summum of manliness: viking, pirate, conquistador, military).
7/2/2025, 12:07:23 AM
Men can't create, only consume. It's both political and biological in nature.
A fundamental thing about men is that they are consumers. That is their self, their mentality and their relation to the world in every aspect of their existence.
Everything they write about capitalism and consumerist culture— the trend towards commodifying everything, consuming more than one needs, valuing material goods over intangible goods such as human relations, seeing everything as disposable—can easily be repurposed as a critique of men and the male psyche.
When your primary self is that of a consumer, you are always dependent on somebody else, outside of you, a producer. There is no security of self to be found when you depend on another organism. Women feel this insecurity with regards to their social self and status, their man-made dependency; men feel this insecurity with regards to their biological self and status, much more deeply and humiliatingly, which is exteriorised as hatred.
Women’s lack of self-security and solidity is artificial, social, man-made, and we can feel it, hence why women fight in a positive way, creating social change. Men’s is biological, deep-rooted, immutable, and they can feel it, hence why they fight in a negative way, by destroying themselves, other men, women, the world.
Men wish they were the producers, godlike, generators of life, hence all of their transparently covetous myths and male deities. But paradoxically, their nature as consumers devalues anything that produces and isn’t a fellow parasite—this is shown in the contempt with which they call women fields to be ploughed, or their lack of concern for land and the Earth which are always coded as female (as Sherry Ortner said, “female is to male as nature is to culture”). Almost every story they produce proves that their masculine ideal is not actually the Creator, but the Raider (summum of manliness: viking, pirate, conquistador, military).
A fundamental thing about men is that they are consumers. That is their self, their mentality and their relation to the world in every aspect of their existence.
Everything they write about capitalism and consumerist culture— the trend towards commodifying everything, consuming more than one needs, valuing material goods over intangible goods such as human relations, seeing everything as disposable—can easily be repurposed as a critique of men and the male psyche.
When your primary self is that of a consumer, you are always dependent on somebody else, outside of you, a producer. There is no security of self to be found when you depend on another organism. Women feel this insecurity with regards to their social self and status, their man-made dependency; men feel this insecurity with regards to their biological self and status, much more deeply and humiliatingly, which is exteriorised as hatred.
Women’s lack of self-security and solidity is artificial, social, man-made, and we can feel it, hence why women fight in a positive way, creating social change. Men’s is biological, deep-rooted, immutable, and they can feel it, hence why they fight in a negative way, by destroying themselves, other men, women, the world.
Men wish they were the producers, godlike, generators of life, hence all of their transparently covetous myths and male deities. But paradoxically, their nature as consumers devalues anything that produces and isn’t a fellow parasite—this is shown in the contempt with which they call women fields to be ploughed, or their lack of concern for land and the Earth which are always coded as female (as Sherry Ortner said, “female is to male as nature is to culture”). Almost every story they produce proves that their masculine ideal is not actually the Creator, but the Raider (summum of manliness: viking, pirate, conquistador, military).
Page 1