>>105769259
nah i got the feeling youre gonna learn my creole instead

>>105612857
>So you do when working with static analyzers.
completely wrong
>C is commonly recommended for starters for people who want to get into Rust.
exactly because nothing holds your hand
except the type checking
and theres little to no abstractions
or rather
the abstractions are at the perfect level where the notable individual operations of a computer are evident, but without having to really get in deep into the details

but thats EXACTLY what makes C a difficult language to work with when dealing with a bigger project
but when youre good enough to define your framework
including the syntax
nothing compares to c

do we really need to compare what it takes to make a double linked list bw our languages again?
you know how things are
*i* know how things are
why do you keep returning to the same talking points?