>>3974094
This isn't a fujo thing, though. In romance in general, the intended target of affection gets most of the depth while the character the audience is expected to relate to is usually left relatively unexplored. You can see this in both sides of hetshit too. And it makes sense. No one reading a romance story wants to spend a lot of time on the character they're not attracted to. Obviously some people pull it off better, but the underlying idea is still usually present.
You're only going to get both sides fully fleshed out either when the romance is in addition to a larger story, in which case it's often the love interest that winds up shallow and tacked on. Or when both sides are of interest to the audience, which is to say a gay romance between two of the same type of character like sho with sho. Man and boy romance is always going to give a lot more attention to the boy no matter who is writing it, unless they're writing it for boys.
I still don't get why you call it bait. Or the soft and unmanly thing. It's more decisively homo than most of the manga/anime/vidya that people post boys from here. And onii-chan is just a regular guy.
I'm not even sure the mangaka is a woman. Someone said that in the 801 thread on /a/, but their only proof was a pic I couldn't find the source of. And the way the mangaka draws themself in the volume extras looks like a dude to me.