Think of the reputational damage to the
>MAAALLLLEEEEE (whoite)
programmer who wrote the CD 32k packet driver.

Before he could say "I have some code in the linux kernel"
And when he wrote it: it WAS the understanding that
>1) it would always be in, maybe improved, but nothing was EVER "DEEPRECIATED" from Linux at that time
>2) "we" (Linus and everyone else) would sue anyone who violated the GPL, or prevented redistribution, OR:
>2b) Failed to SEND LINUS the changes back.
Yes: Linus is on record (video, text, and audio), on old Slashdot articles from 1999-2002 era saying he expects all changes to come back to him

>But that's not in the GPL!
And yet all the Linux hobbiest kernel programmers of that time understood it as a requirement: and wrote in attestation to that: thus that can be recognised as part of the deal by a court (GPL is not voluminous enough to trigger the "4 corners" "completely integrated document" rule: nor does Linux dev history support such)

NOW: that
>WHOITE MMAALALLLLLEEEEE
programmer will never be considered for a position because he now has the reputation of:
>his "crap code" being thrown out of linux for FUCKING THINGS UP
(20 years after the fact, but who cares: WOMEN and TRANSFAGGOTS are NOT at fault: the original WHAITE MAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLE PEDO FUCK is the one AT FAULT not wrighting code that would see into the future.
>ALSO HIS CODE IS __OUT___ HAHAHHAHA

>>509102843
>>>509102771 (You)
>Can you please stop posting? You're legitimately ruining the thread spamming it with your long posts that no one is reading. You're probably too schizophrenic to understand this, but most of what you're saying is just gibberish to everyone here. Nobody even understands what you mean, let alone being interested in arguing against it. You're a loony. Fuck off

No.
I was here before you.
I am also a licensed attorney, and a programmer (C, QC).
If I were a skizo: how did I pass the Bar exam?
How can I program?

I was on this website years before you.