>>24532298
What? Are you telling me queers of the likes of you are willing to die for the right of mutilating their penis or masturbating to cartoon porn? That notion is laughable. A janny can control your "speech" by giving you a ban, don't get cocky now, creature.
>>24532333
>explain how
I already did, here:
>I believe cultures should derive utility from the principles they hold dear
>This implies a process in which the pros and cons of a "principle" are analyzed and contrasted
I don't particularly care about what the founding fathers thought, even if they envisioned a future in which children could be convinced to cut themselves for the pleasure of creeps on something like the internet where these behaviors could be seen and imitated by millions of people and decided that it was a sacrifice they were willing to make for the sake of somehow protecting dissent, even thought it entails a completely different category of speech that is easily distinguishable from others, the fact remains your kind of free speech doesn't make the cut when analyzed from an utilitarian perspective.
We know nothing of value has come out of this website, nothing of value is coming out of this website, and i can predict without the shadow of a doubt that nothing of value will come out this website for as long as it exists, its influence notwithstanding. The world is rotting and the cause is obvious, saying you don't care would be a more honest approach than giving these cynical answers.
But of course, history is filled with examples of brutal political repression preceded by politicians passing laws outlawing nigger worship imageboards, so maybe you are right.