>>531191810
>Is it a matter of equivalence
Somewhat yes. Because I genuinely think they're both inherently sexual no matter other guys try to frame it otherwise. Maybe I'm just incapable of seeing the supposed difference, but to me everyone has tits. They're both in the same position of the chest and capable of being squishy mounds of flesh complete with an areola and nipple in the center. What makes a woman's more obscene? The fact that it has function? Function completely outside of the realm of sex? Without a baby, women and men boobs function exactly the same and only serve as eye candy.
>Men don't have tits, it's muscle
For one, men do in fact have breast tissue but besides that point, the muscle still expands that part of the chest to the point where it protrudes out of some you guy's shirts in a very noticeable way. Like some of you are bigger than some of the girls I see walking down the street and because you don't wear a bra, I have to see your hard nipples poking through the shirt too.
When I go to the beach and see some of the guys run past me, though things are flopping up and down just as much as the women's do and yet for some reason it's okay to people. Maybe I'm just autistic because I can not understand the difference, I think both are fundamentally a bit obscene once they grow past the flat stage.

And this is why Sonic having a protruding chest that chinese fans love is disturbing to me or something