Search Results
6/27/2025, 2:39:43 AM
>>508834209
I can't become a roman catholic because the more I study church history it shows that the Bishop of Rome as a universal or supreme bishop has no historical basis in the first millennium.
It's very clear that the pentarchy being 4 churches in the east and 1 church in the west with minimal contact due to geographic distance resulted in power swelling in the Rome-centric west while the other four all equally counterbalanced one another. Tack on how the Roman Empire collapsed in the west resulting in the Papal States while the East always had a Roman Emperor until they were all conquered by Muslims, it just makes logical sense why the Papacy ended the way it did, but not for any Biblically or theologically justifiable reasons.
Eastern Catholicism just seems even more absurd when it exposes that the Roman Catholics don't care about anything except the acknowledgement of the Pope as supreme. You can larp as an Orthodox, do the Eastern Rite, say the Nicene Creed without the Filioque (as it is written in marble on the walls of the Vatican), teach against purgatory, deliver the eucharist into mouth and it isn't a problem so long as you acknowledge the primacy of the Bishop of Rome. Theology doesn't matter to them. Geopolitical influence is the only thing they care about, and the Papacy is at this point too big to fail. They'll never humble themselves.
Also have a bonus video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDOKd1z3NmM
I can't become a roman catholic because the more I study church history it shows that the Bishop of Rome as a universal or supreme bishop has no historical basis in the first millennium.
It's very clear that the pentarchy being 4 churches in the east and 1 church in the west with minimal contact due to geographic distance resulted in power swelling in the Rome-centric west while the other four all equally counterbalanced one another. Tack on how the Roman Empire collapsed in the west resulting in the Papal States while the East always had a Roman Emperor until they were all conquered by Muslims, it just makes logical sense why the Papacy ended the way it did, but not for any Biblically or theologically justifiable reasons.
Eastern Catholicism just seems even more absurd when it exposes that the Roman Catholics don't care about anything except the acknowledgement of the Pope as supreme. You can larp as an Orthodox, do the Eastern Rite, say the Nicene Creed without the Filioque (as it is written in marble on the walls of the Vatican), teach against purgatory, deliver the eucharist into mouth and it isn't a problem so long as you acknowledge the primacy of the Bishop of Rome. Theology doesn't matter to them. Geopolitical influence is the only thing they care about, and the Papacy is at this point too big to fail. They'll never humble themselves.
Also have a bonus video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDOKd1z3NmM
6/19/2025, 6:36:16 AM
>>507922959
I'm lutheran (LCMS) and have been inquiring for about 3 months now. It's pretty good. I think I had finally had my fill with derivative non-denominational/restorationist/baptist churches but there weren't any active, uncucked Lutheran churches in my town. I'm going to an OCA parish so everyone speaks English and the community is great and welcoming.
>>507936510
If the EP recognized OCA, it'd become the largest and most powerful church in Orthodoxy overnight, and the EP has too much to lose here granting autocephaly.
>>507935688
I can't become a roman catholic because the more I study church history it shows that the Bishop of Rome as a universal or supreme bishop has no historical basis in the first millennium.
It's very clear that the pentarchy being 4 churches in the east and 1 church in the west with minimal contact due to geographic distance resulted in power swelling in the Rome-centric west while the other four all equally counterbalanced one another. Tack on how the Roman Empire collapsed in the west resulting in the Papal States while the East always had a Roman Emperor until they were all conquered by Muslims, it just makes logical sense why the Papacy ended the way it did, but not for any Biblically or theologically justifiable reasons.
Eastern Catholicism just seems even more absurd when it exposes that the Roman Catholics don't care about anything except the acknowledgement of the Pope as supreme. You can larp as an Orthodox, do the Eastern Rite, say the Nicene Creed without the Filioque (as it is written in marble on the walls of the Vatican), teach against purgatory, deliver the eucharist into mouth and it isn't a problem so long as you acknowledge the primacy of the Bishop of Rome. Theology doesn't matter to them. Geopolitical influence is the only thing they care about, and the Papacy is at this point too big to fail. They'll never humble themselves.
I posted this on /his/ once but it felt like an adequate response to your post.
I'm lutheran (LCMS) and have been inquiring for about 3 months now. It's pretty good. I think I had finally had my fill with derivative non-denominational/restorationist/baptist churches but there weren't any active, uncucked Lutheran churches in my town. I'm going to an OCA parish so everyone speaks English and the community is great and welcoming.
>>507936510
If the EP recognized OCA, it'd become the largest and most powerful church in Orthodoxy overnight, and the EP has too much to lose here granting autocephaly.
>>507935688
I can't become a roman catholic because the more I study church history it shows that the Bishop of Rome as a universal or supreme bishop has no historical basis in the first millennium.
It's very clear that the pentarchy being 4 churches in the east and 1 church in the west with minimal contact due to geographic distance resulted in power swelling in the Rome-centric west while the other four all equally counterbalanced one another. Tack on how the Roman Empire collapsed in the west resulting in the Papal States while the East always had a Roman Emperor until they were all conquered by Muslims, it just makes logical sense why the Papacy ended the way it did, but not for any Biblically or theologically justifiable reasons.
Eastern Catholicism just seems even more absurd when it exposes that the Roman Catholics don't care about anything except the acknowledgement of the Pope as supreme. You can larp as an Orthodox, do the Eastern Rite, say the Nicene Creed without the Filioque (as it is written in marble on the walls of the Vatican), teach against purgatory, deliver the eucharist into mouth and it isn't a problem so long as you acknowledge the primacy of the Bishop of Rome. Theology doesn't matter to them. Geopolitical influence is the only thing they care about, and the Papacy is at this point too big to fail. They'll never humble themselves.
I posted this on /his/ once but it felt like an adequate response to your post.
Page 1