>>714806386
>>714828939
>AI starts generating pictures
>smart people say it will generate full videos in a few years
>you guys say it will never happen, it's impossible
>months later we start seeing janky videos proving the concept can bear fruit
>you guys say it will never improve
>months later it improves and you can now generate them on your own gaming PC
>you guys laugh and say it's not perfect and that it will never improve
>months later it improves dramatically, instead of 2 second clips it can generate 1 minute long clip that look eerily close to reality
>you guys say it will never improve, it's a dead end, while you also cry about muh copyrights and other bullshit
>months later China makes its own video models and releases them for public use
>you guys say it will never improve, but mostly ignore it because it's getting goo
>months later it improves and you start seeing people getting laid off because it's pretty good at making ads and splash stuff
>lots of seething, still arguing it will never improve
>meanwhile audio is getting applied to the video, it's janky but it's something you guys also said was impossible
>months later it does improve and the audio and video are both getting eerily close to reality, it can literally fool the vast majority of humanity now
>AI "actors" can act while speaking while environmental sounds play, it's mostly decent and only v1
This is where we're at now. In some months we'll start seeing fully generated long form videos straight from one single model, and then movies. Just like the smart guys stated all those years ago. We can splice together technology to make TV shows(like Family Guy AI) but that doesn't count.

Now, why would you argue this won't also happen with video games? The way generative AI works is that you feed it data(in this case audio and visual data) and it spits out videos. For games you can feed it all the game stuff and it will also spit out games.