Search Results
7/3/2025, 7:40:14 PM
do you agree that the mentally ill should have no access to firearms? no? then you support mass murder and your own death, is that okay with you?
if yes, the only way to do that is to introduce gun licensing with a mental health screening or permanently isolate the mentally ill in special institutions. the latter is not an option for america because muh rights and whatever
and before you say muh FGC-9 muh Urutau muh nailgun blanks: ban ammo casings and that's no longer an option. this is already the case for south korea, japan and china. the countries where gun control actually works and the crime is record low in the entire world.
the idea that everyone should have firearms is fundamentally ill. it's a privilege, not a right.
a firearm is only required to COUNTER another firearm, there are no exceptions. if there are no firearms among the civilian population there will be less crime.
if yes, the only way to do that is to introduce gun licensing with a mental health screening or permanently isolate the mentally ill in special institutions. the latter is not an option for america because muh rights and whatever
and before you say muh FGC-9 muh Urutau muh nailgun blanks: ban ammo casings and that's no longer an option. this is already the case for south korea, japan and china. the countries where gun control actually works and the crime is record low in the entire world.
the idea that everyone should have firearms is fundamentally ill. it's a privilege, not a right.
a firearm is only required to COUNTER another firearm, there are no exceptions. if there are no firearms among the civilian population there will be less crime.
7/2/2025, 3:55:06 AM
Page 1