>>64062672
>Privi PPU
https://youtu.be/0M1FJzoNZ4c?t=261
That appears to burn hotter than PMC X-TAC. Thanks for the rec, anon. I'll keep an eye out for it

>>64062667
Back in my day, we had something called a linear comp

>>64062460
>ammo glut arriving due to mistiming mfg against conflict timetables
Please, God– let this happen

>>64062541
>>64062719
He's trying to turn everyone I care about in /arg/ against me as revenge for the past but I've made a commitment to bring a more positive and collaborative attitude to my /k/ posting

>>64062738
It's funny, this reminds me of an argument that came up in CAD class when someone from the manufacturing industry did a guest lecture. It was a small class, so there was a Q&A and some guy who was doing applied physics objected to the speaker implying that such classes are academic when you actually begin material simulations and prototyping. It's much like what Wuggy posted the other day >>63995455 Oh shit, that's not Wuggy at all