>>106012183
>There is no "best implementation."
That is the best built-in "hardware" BFI OLED displays have ever had, as far as we know.
You're free to show us a better implementation.
>And there are other motion clarity techniques that are not BFI that are better
Such as?
>why do you show 120hz?
Because that's what that display could do. 60hz and 120hz BFI both with ~3.5ms persistence*, with 60hz being just barely bright enough to use from what I've been told.
*Source: rtings
>Source for this retarded claim?
Simple math >>106010221 and all existing BFI implementations, such as the one on the LG CX. The last OLED TV to even have functional BFI.
>No you don't because then you would have to 41%, which is why you are pretending that your arguments make any sense.
Seethe more faggot. Show me an OLED doing 60hz with similar clarity to a CRT. And then tell me how bright it is.
You cannot find one example. Such a thing doesn't exist. It's not possible to do with today's tech. It's just not.