Search Results
7/11/2025, 3:01:03 PM
>>510088238
>I just proved you that peacemaking works with the example of a real life organization
Your argument is that the existance of a singular example of survival/success of a "peacemaking" organization refutes the fact that reality is based on competition and scarcity. Thats not an argument, that's an example. This is the structue of an argument:
>Statment/Premise
>Logical Proof
>Example for ease of demonstration/understanding
>Conclusion
Also, I never stated more implied that "peacemaking" organisations could not exist or function; if you actually had enough braincells to read and understand my previous post you would realize they fall under the acquisitory strategy of either TRADE or SEDUCTION.
>Frieren is hardly realistic, there are countless examples of killers who redeemed themselves and became functional members of society.
And there are countless who havent. According to your own logic, do these examples of non-redemption not refute your own statement?
>Aristotle
Eudaimonia does not mean the english mistranslation of "happiness", or as modern types prefer to interpret it, the pursuit of the hedonistic imperative.
It is rather the total fulfillment of the PURPOSE inherent within the human being, as a whole composed of lesser (plant and animal soul, aka growth, sensation and reaction aka physis and pathos) impulses, and higher (rationality, creativity, imagination and analysis, aka logos).
>I just proved you that peacemaking works with the example of a real life organization
Your argument is that the existance of a singular example of survival/success of a "peacemaking" organization refutes the fact that reality is based on competition and scarcity. Thats not an argument, that's an example. This is the structue of an argument:
>Statment/Premise
>Logical Proof
>Example for ease of demonstration/understanding
>Conclusion
Also, I never stated more implied that "peacemaking" organisations could not exist or function; if you actually had enough braincells to read and understand my previous post you would realize they fall under the acquisitory strategy of either TRADE or SEDUCTION.
>Frieren is hardly realistic, there are countless examples of killers who redeemed themselves and became functional members of society.
And there are countless who havent. According to your own logic, do these examples of non-redemption not refute your own statement?
>Aristotle
Eudaimonia does not mean the english mistranslation of "happiness", or as modern types prefer to interpret it, the pursuit of the hedonistic imperative.
It is rather the total fulfillment of the PURPOSE inherent within the human being, as a whole composed of lesser (plant and animal soul, aka growth, sensation and reaction aka physis and pathos) impulses, and higher (rationality, creativity, imagination and analysis, aka logos).
Page 1