Search Results
7/1/2025, 5:49:31 PM
>>212312938
>An average European is probably descended from nearly every person in Europe in that time.
No. Absolutely not. This is one of the worst American ideas created to support the theory that they are part jew.
Let me explain.
The idea comes from the fact that the number of ancestors doubles every generation exponentially.
Like, I have 2 parents and 4 grandfathers. If we pretend that the average cycle takes 30 years. This is 33 generations in 1000 years. 2^33 is 8589934592 people. Way more than all humans lived back then. But people don't take into account that people also marry distant relatives ALL THE TIME.
But americans refuse to believe in this and like to claim that they are all part jew because there was not enough people in europe at that time (but when you ask if they would also be part chinese and african because there was also not many people in the Middle East, they block you)
>An average European is probably descended from nearly every person in Europe in that time.
No. Absolutely not. This is one of the worst American ideas created to support the theory that they are part jew.
Let me explain.
The idea comes from the fact that the number of ancestors doubles every generation exponentially.
Like, I have 2 parents and 4 grandfathers. If we pretend that the average cycle takes 30 years. This is 33 generations in 1000 years. 2^33 is 8589934592 people. Way more than all humans lived back then. But people don't take into account that people also marry distant relatives ALL THE TIME.
But americans refuse to believe in this and like to claim that they are all part jew because there was not enough people in europe at that time (but when you ask if they would also be part chinese and african because there was also not many people in the Middle East, they block you)
7/1/2025, 3:58:55 PM
>>105761581
>it's a meaningless debate
Yes. It is.
Some losers don't like change. It was always like this.
Some people here are old enough to remember when Xorg replaced XFree86 and the mail lists were the same shit.
Some people kept "updating" XFree86 up to 2008, years after it had been replaced...
What was the point of that? NONE. It was just losers, no different from the ones who think Xorg (and all their unfixable issues) has a chance to be used again.
Wayland is the new standard, and forking xorg into something that doesn't even support wayland out of spite (yes, you can run xorg applications inside wayland, but you can't run wayland applications inside Xlibre) will just make it a snowflake program that is used by a niche of enthusiasts who brag about running it daily on their computers but in reality just have it in a VM for internet points.
>it's a meaningless debate
Yes. It is.
Some losers don't like change. It was always like this.
Some people here are old enough to remember when Xorg replaced XFree86 and the mail lists were the same shit.
Some people kept "updating" XFree86 up to 2008, years after it had been replaced...
What was the point of that? NONE. It was just losers, no different from the ones who think Xorg (and all their unfixable issues) has a chance to be used again.
Wayland is the new standard, and forking xorg into something that doesn't even support wayland out of spite (yes, you can run xorg applications inside wayland, but you can't run wayland applications inside Xlibre) will just make it a snowflake program that is used by a niche of enthusiasts who brag about running it daily on their computers but in reality just have it in a VM for internet points.
Page 1