>>714081975
>NAP
Holy shit please don't tell me you're one of those lmao. You have no rights without government, and the NAP amounts to little more than a handshake deal so it would 100% be violated in your hypothetical libertarian paradise. The only difference is that without laws to fall back on, you'd have no recourse against those more powerful than you. And if you're going to pretend that there would be a legal structure in place to preserve the NAP and enforce actions against those who violate it, that makes you both a hypocrite and a retard since you'd just be arguing in favor of an objectively less useful government at that point.

And even if there were no government, you'd still be reliant on certain socological realities that come with money and power, which would function as a de facto government until the powers-that-be of that system just decided to go back to having an ACTUAL government, since it's way more profitable for them and they get greater social control that way. Regardless of how you feel about it, the reality is that you will always be under the control of a system greater than yourself, so it's better to participate in a democratic, pro-consumer civilization than to just leave it to the 'free market'.