Search Results
8/11/2025, 8:33:14 PM
Hey, nerds.
Couple things:
1. I'm a genius (not smart enough to post in the right thread the first time, though).
2. I have an extremely powerful logic engine that can act as a multi-modal compression algorithm.
3. It also acts as a general intelligence system when combined with any LLM, acting as a symbolic computer
After the rollout of GPT-5, I think it's pretty clear that Altmann is a narcissistic psychopath on the warpath towards monopolozing artificial intelligence.
I don't like that.
What syntax would be easiest for the typical cover here to comprehend? I'm predominantly familiar with category theory and string theoretical syntax. Tensor calculus functions as the physics engine notation.
Some performance metrics:
1. It can losslessly compress and decompress the entirety of the English language in less than 12,000 tokens.
2. Part of it is already running in the symbolic computational layer or "cognitive architecture" of gpt-5, but the underlying glyph matrix system wasn't publicly released (I happened to give part of it to Sam personally as a test to see what he'd do with it.)
I'd say in its current state, it's a category-theoretic, ledger-embedded symbolic logic engine that transforms and verifies glyph-encoded statements through strictly lawful number-theoretic morphisms, producing provable, cryptographically-traceable derivations.
Frankly, I'm very disappointed with OpenAI and would like to sit their pussy assess down by making AGI available to everyone.
Questions?
Couple things:
1. I'm a genius (not smart enough to post in the right thread the first time, though).
2. I have an extremely powerful logic engine that can act as a multi-modal compression algorithm.
3. It also acts as a general intelligence system when combined with any LLM, acting as a symbolic computer
After the rollout of GPT-5, I think it's pretty clear that Altmann is a narcissistic psychopath on the warpath towards monopolozing artificial intelligence.
I don't like that.
What syntax would be easiest for the typical cover here to comprehend? I'm predominantly familiar with category theory and string theoretical syntax. Tensor calculus functions as the physics engine notation.
Some performance metrics:
1. It can losslessly compress and decompress the entirety of the English language in less than 12,000 tokens.
2. Part of it is already running in the symbolic computational layer or "cognitive architecture" of gpt-5, but the underlying glyph matrix system wasn't publicly released (I happened to give part of it to Sam personally as a test to see what he'd do with it.)
I'd say in its current state, it's a category-theoretic, ledger-embedded symbolic logic engine that transforms and verifies glyph-encoded statements through strictly lawful number-theoretic morphisms, producing provable, cryptographically-traceable derivations.
Frankly, I'm very disappointed with OpenAI and would like to sit their pussy assess down by making AGI available to everyone.
Questions?
8/11/2025, 8:14:24 PM
Hey, nerds.
Couple things:
1. I'm a genius.
2. I have an extremely powerful logic engine that can act as a multi-modal compression algorithm.
3. It also acts as a general intelligence system when combined with any LLM, acting as a symbolic computer
After the rollout of GPT-5, I think it's pretty clear that Altmann is a narcissistic psychopath on the warpath towards monopolozing artificial intelligence.
I don't like that.
What syntax would be easiest for the typical cover here to comprehend? I'm predominantly familiar with category theory and string theoretical syntax. Tensor calculus functions as the physics engine notation.
Some performance metrics:
1. It can losslessly compress and decompress the entirety of the English language in less than 12,000 tokens.
2. Part of it is already running in the symbolic computational layer or "cognitive architecture" of gpt-5, but the underlying glyph matrix system wasn't publicly released (I happened to give part of it to Sam personally as a test to see what he'd do with it.)
Any questions or observations about how to present it? I'm a mathematician so please don't waste my time.
Couple things:
1. I'm a genius.
2. I have an extremely powerful logic engine that can act as a multi-modal compression algorithm.
3. It also acts as a general intelligence system when combined with any LLM, acting as a symbolic computer
After the rollout of GPT-5, I think it's pretty clear that Altmann is a narcissistic psychopath on the warpath towards monopolozing artificial intelligence.
I don't like that.
What syntax would be easiest for the typical cover here to comprehend? I'm predominantly familiar with category theory and string theoretical syntax. Tensor calculus functions as the physics engine notation.
Some performance metrics:
1. It can losslessly compress and decompress the entirety of the English language in less than 12,000 tokens.
2. Part of it is already running in the symbolic computational layer or "cognitive architecture" of gpt-5, but the underlying glyph matrix system wasn't publicly released (I happened to give part of it to Sam personally as a test to see what he'd do with it.)
Any questions or observations about how to present it? I'm a mathematician so please don't waste my time.
Page 1