>>510040223
another thing, i noticed that you intentionally went out of your way to read those verses i gave that prop up the notion of racial preference within Christianity in a way that couldn't.
you go out of your way to make Christianity not fit with racial preference, which means your objection to it has nothing to do with racial preference.
what's the real bone of contention between you and the truth of the Gospel?

would you happen to be a homosexual?
that's honestly the only rational reason for this sort of behavior i can think of.