>>280214079
>To keep the experiment untainted, obviously I did not link it.
You could've easily posted a link after it archived you dork
>very open ended thread on young jump magazine
Is this it? No wonder it got 1 reply

>old mag cover that few will recognise
>listing franchises that get their own threads anyway
>pointless question that doesn't inspire anything but vapid praise/contention

Think for a second, why would anyone click this over the 149 other threads on the catalog? This isn't /a/'s problem, you just don't know how to make threads which get attention