>>23372883
So basically you're just admitting you have no standards? Good for you I guess. I myself have no interest in AI-generated anything. The novelty wore off yeaes ago for me and nowadays every gen looks exactly the fucking same to me. Doesn't matter if it's realistic or not, it all has this awful plasticy sheen to it that reminds me of really bad Blender porn. And if I wanted to make my own porn I'd rather learn to draw it because under no circumstances will I pay for spankbank material. But ultimately I don't give a shit if you do as long as you're not trying to evangelize AI like a Mormon missionary.