>>105902568
>unverified
To be verified by whom? The British Raj? If you have doubts, how about you review the source code yourself instead of crying like a little bitch on a technology forum where people routinely use FOSS operating systems that have not been audited by any "authority".

>>105900921
>You are right, we should just blindly believe the claims of the developers and community
Whomst are you quoting? No one is forced to trust anyone blindly. The way the proprietary components of GrapheneOS are isolated is completely transparent and open source, as is the code surrounding the Titan M2.

>>105901689
Oh wow, how will I ever recover from this?