Search Results
7/20/2025, 9:14:45 PM
I REALLY love inconsistencies in operating systems. I'm literally obsessed with using software that:
- use weird configuration formats (e.g., systemd's ini masterpiece)
- end in an extension I love, such as *.cfg instead of *.conf or not *rc in my $HOME
- use an "_" instead of a "-" in their executable name
- use long options more properly (e.g., -version instead of --version)
- don't cuck themselves like retards to $HOME and put files in the proper corresponding locations such as .config, .local, etc.
Sometimes, I even check the source code of the software I'm interested in to see if it follows the language's coding style guide. If it does, I decide not to use it. The thought of having such a gay software written by cucks installed on my machine literally gives me a sharp pain. If I somehow by accident do have software like that installed, I uninstall it. But even after uninstalling, I constantly think about reinstalling my OS because I think it's dirty.
Anyone else do this?
- use weird configuration formats (e.g., systemd's ini masterpiece)
- end in an extension I love, such as *.cfg instead of *.conf or not *rc in my $HOME
- use an "_" instead of a "-" in their executable name
- use long options more properly (e.g., -version instead of --version)
- don't cuck themselves like retards to $HOME and put files in the proper corresponding locations such as .config, .local, etc.
Sometimes, I even check the source code of the software I'm interested in to see if it follows the language's coding style guide. If it does, I decide not to use it. The thought of having such a gay software written by cucks installed on my machine literally gives me a sharp pain. If I somehow by accident do have software like that installed, I uninstall it. But even after uninstalling, I constantly think about reinstalling my OS because I think it's dirty.
Anyone else do this?
Page 1