Search Results
6/25/2025, 7:00:51 PM
>>81612415
Yes fair, but when they did it it was through strategic conquest and warfare. They were brilliant generals. And both actually fought on the front as well. Hitler was pissed that he lost WWI and then ordered a bunch of people to be systematically slaughtered in camps. There was no real conquest there, no real strategy, and he didnt really fight. His generals created the war strategies. He wasnt a general. I guess at some point he became something like a supreme military commander by default, but a lot of his decisions were flawed, careless, and clumsy. He never actually had to climb the ranks. Only real W was the invasion of France, but besides the use of Blitzkrieg that was really just the Schliefen plan 2.0. Plus, their defense was trash to begin with. It wasnt brilliance with him, it was cowardice. And I do not respect that.
Yes fair, but when they did it it was through strategic conquest and warfare. They were brilliant generals. And both actually fought on the front as well. Hitler was pissed that he lost WWI and then ordered a bunch of people to be systematically slaughtered in camps. There was no real conquest there, no real strategy, and he didnt really fight. His generals created the war strategies. He wasnt a general. I guess at some point he became something like a supreme military commander by default, but a lot of his decisions were flawed, careless, and clumsy. He never actually had to climb the ranks. Only real W was the invasion of France, but besides the use of Blitzkrieg that was really just the Schliefen plan 2.0. Plus, their defense was trash to begin with. It wasnt brilliance with him, it was cowardice. And I do not respect that.
Page 1