>>508073230
>it's a psy-op to make conspiracy theories in general seem retarded, same with flat earth.
nah, there are general concerns about all the nuclear test footage we've been shown looking fake/produced as fuck. there is no reason to equate it at all to flat earth, and that's what the flat earth psyoppers want you to be doing with every single other conspiracy theory. an open-mided investigation of nuclear footage fakery should leave one questioning.

as for the japan events specifically, there is indeed a decent amount of evidence that those incidents could have been conventional bombing runs. anyone actually interested in these theories can do the research and make up their own minds. i haven't looked at the evidence in quite some time but typical concerns include things like telephone poles and structures at ground 0 remaining standing, whereas future nuclear test footage shows utility poles coming down like toothpicks. so which is it? also, a really ridiculous photo on the ground (picrel) that is a clear and obvious fake. followed by heavy duty censorship by the US of anyone even communicating about the attacks afterwards. like they maintained a literal wartime censorship office in japan for years that would read people's mail and listen in on phone calls. so there is plenty of reason to question the japan stuff

my personal conclusion is that nukes are probably real but real footage of them, if it exists, has never been shown to the public.