>>81897283
>predicted the order of popularity would be 2>5>6>4>3>1
because you're a dumb faggot who refuses to talk and listen to real people - men and women - properly
bet you also think answers would correlate 1:1 with actual choices given the real chance. literally making conclusions before N=100. wtf is this s-o-yence retardation? read a book, sissy

>>713042665
bring back the word weaboo

Can we expect a 5080 Ti Super that uses a cut down GB202 chip and has 24GB VRAM?