>>81897389>because you're a dumb faggot who refuses to talk and listen to real people - men and women - properlyyou're making a lot of assumptions lol
>bet you also think answers would correlate 1:1 with actual choices given the real chance. literally making conclusions before N=100. wtf is this s-o-yence retardation?probably not because 1's cheating would not be immediately apparent but otherwise yeah. My bad for not being incredibly academically rigorous in a 4chan thread lmao.
At the end of the day my predictions were still in the broad placements correct and I can point to what exactly caused the inaccuracy, so I'm still pretty confident in all my reasoning.
>>81897487I'd still easily put 1 further down and alchoholguy can still do well among the others depending on personal preference. Unless you assume 2 is violent but I don't think that's fair. Maybe that's just my experience though.
t. had alcoholic dad who would never hurt a fly but slowly turned retarded
>>81897608If you assume that change is possible it kind of defeats the entire point i m o. I disqualified
>>81895198 's vote when I was tallying for that reason