>>81897653
well aren't you funny as fuck
here's what's your paper would be like
title
>femanon husbands survey
methodology
>wide dataset of husbands (6 units) to choose from, perfected as per 4chan threads of previous attempts of the survey and common sense of what women like [citation needed]
participants
>uncountable amount of anonymous people, hopefully mostly female at birth
introduction
>foids be foiding
vote legibility
>idk I guess
results
>fewer than 100 votes so far, but I'm not counting further
conclusions
>the votes were made with different expressed thoughts but I managed to neuter it all into statistics
>I'm confident in my reasoning