Search Results
7/6/2025, 1:42:13 AM
>>17817657
>Again, "they" is super vague. what are these contradictions, and what do they disagree on, numbers? manner of deaths?
Among those who have provided an estimate, they disagree widely on the number of deaths that are supposed to have occurred. The issue, however, is that "non-officials" are unfairly demonized even for questioning it.
Very bizarre accounts can be found which claimed that highly unusual ways of killing were employed. But you don't see the same kind of corroboration of these events by other sources, who should have witnessed the same events. The corroboration evaporates when it comes to these details. Among these stories, each person seems to come forward their own story. False witnesses of this type have also been forced to admit to making provably false claims, and they express no remorse for having done so nor are there consequences enacted against them. Perhaps because of confirmation bias, their stories were never really questioned by many listeners. Propaganda was more important than truth. But if these events had happened, you would expect there to be more than one source that corroborates it. There is a veritable galaxy of bizarre claims of German atrocities from this time. I have a collection of such claims.
If you turn from that to look at the "official" narratives, authorities have tried to paint a consistent picture to hold out as official. But they've had to continually revise and re-calibrate the narrative to suit what would be acceptable or believable, or what would pass snuff at any given time. At one point they were legitimizing the claims of "soap made from humans" for example. Later they massively backtracked and began to concede that there is no evidence to suggest these atrocities.
The official "historians" seem to concede now that their predecessors had been wrong about these details, but paradoxically try to assert what remains of their narrative (maybe because it's their job) as being "beyond questioning."
>Again, "they" is super vague. what are these contradictions, and what do they disagree on, numbers? manner of deaths?
Among those who have provided an estimate, they disagree widely on the number of deaths that are supposed to have occurred. The issue, however, is that "non-officials" are unfairly demonized even for questioning it.
Very bizarre accounts can be found which claimed that highly unusual ways of killing were employed. But you don't see the same kind of corroboration of these events by other sources, who should have witnessed the same events. The corroboration evaporates when it comes to these details. Among these stories, each person seems to come forward their own story. False witnesses of this type have also been forced to admit to making provably false claims, and they express no remorse for having done so nor are there consequences enacted against them. Perhaps because of confirmation bias, their stories were never really questioned by many listeners. Propaganda was more important than truth. But if these events had happened, you would expect there to be more than one source that corroborates it. There is a veritable galaxy of bizarre claims of German atrocities from this time. I have a collection of such claims.
If you turn from that to look at the "official" narratives, authorities have tried to paint a consistent picture to hold out as official. But they've had to continually revise and re-calibrate the narrative to suit what would be acceptable or believable, or what would pass snuff at any given time. At one point they were legitimizing the claims of "soap made from humans" for example. Later they massively backtracked and began to concede that there is no evidence to suggest these atrocities.
The official "historians" seem to concede now that their predecessors had been wrong about these details, but paradoxically try to assert what remains of their narrative (maybe because it's their job) as being "beyond questioning."
Page 1