>>17891898
Nope, and again, you should read How the War was Won by Phillips O'brien

Allied kill ratio was around 4:1, albeit it was over German skies, so naturally pilots would survive/not being captured

It's the reason why during Battle for Britain, the Luftwaffe lost 3x more pilots than England.
The bottom line is that Germany spent 40-50% of her entire wartime munition production on single engine aircrafts specifically to counter allied bombing

You only have surface level understanding of ww2, hence why you dont understand the porportion of allied contribution since its more measured in material rather than boots on the ground. The overwhelming majority of the wehrmacht soldiers were deployed in the east but AFV production only amounted to 5-10% of German munition, which is less than what Germany invested in the navy which was specifically used against the allies, and less than her AA-gun production which was primarily used to defend German cities.
You also seem to diregard the real damage that allied bombing did to Germany, only focusing on civilian casualties for some reason, tho this was almost neglected by the allies

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_of_the_Reich

And then we havent even considered lend-lease contribution to both the Chinese and the Soviets, nor the fact that the allies were themselves fighting a 2-frontal war.
You also completely disregard the North Africa campaign / Mediteranian campaign which kinda shows your bias/uneducated level. The battle for Tunis for example was one of the most catastrophic defeats of the Axis on parallel with Stalingrad (they both occured roughly at the same time. The allies captured 300.000 prisoners, destroyed roughly 500 tanks, and 4000(!) luftwaffe aircrafts, and captured a mountain of German heavy equiptment, while sinking the entire Axis mediteranian fleet. It's been completely overlooked because normie media history focus on Stalingrad but the defeat at Tunis was an equal shock to the German command