Search Results
7/1/2025, 6:51:42 PM
>>149230777
There's some really great breakdowns on youtube that go over animation techniques, and of course there's copies of technique books floating around on the internet. Williams' Survival Guide has an entire chapter on breaking down the process of mapping out motion and working out your keyframes, breakdowns, etc. There's a lot of physics that goes into animation - understanding how motion, acceleration, and jerk translate into displacement and rotation of objects.
>>149230826
Copyright protections are probably the biggest reason why you're seeing the studios keep everything in-house and developing proprietary models and using their own materials for everything; it's a much easier legal case for a studio like, say, Disney, to claim that content produced by a model *they* made and that *they* trained using art *their* artists produced is protected than it is to claim something generated using an open source model that scrapes random data from the internet like ChatGPT or Dall-E or VEO is protected. The studios see the writing on the wall - AI isn't going away as a tool, but it's only going to be useful if you have some avenue for exerting legal control over the content you make using it.
There's some really great breakdowns on youtube that go over animation techniques, and of course there's copies of technique books floating around on the internet. Williams' Survival Guide has an entire chapter on breaking down the process of mapping out motion and working out your keyframes, breakdowns, etc. There's a lot of physics that goes into animation - understanding how motion, acceleration, and jerk translate into displacement and rotation of objects.
>>149230826
Copyright protections are probably the biggest reason why you're seeing the studios keep everything in-house and developing proprietary models and using their own materials for everything; it's a much easier legal case for a studio like, say, Disney, to claim that content produced by a model *they* made and that *they* trained using art *their* artists produced is protected than it is to claim something generated using an open source model that scrapes random data from the internet like ChatGPT or Dall-E or VEO is protected. The studios see the writing on the wall - AI isn't going away as a tool, but it's only going to be useful if you have some avenue for exerting legal control over the content you make using it.
Page 1