>>105588951
I don't think so. You don't know how bad Flux looked if you think that's the case, and how next to impossible is to get Flux to do anything remotely close to photorealism. Note here
>it's possible to slop the model a bit and get more consistent hands

I mean just the look of the gen and the skin itself, but not the actual capabilities of the model. Even with its slopped version, the model still retains the ability to do NSFW and follows the prompt to a tee compared to Flux (such as if you're prompting for feet or a woman in a lewd position). In fact, the fake skin is only a flaw if you dislike it, otherwise the model is good and still not as bad as Flux.

Also with Flux it is not possible to prompt realistic blood, bondage, etc... and this model still excels even when it chooses to output slop.