>>17895505
nor do i but i've been thinking about it a little over the past few months and my conclusion is that the nazi party would have changed somewhat dramatically had the war been stopped by someone with power like churchill, for example
why, you ask? simple - look at the way the ruling party and the nation developed over time, it was merely responding to external factors just as much, if not more, than it was putting it's own ideology into practice
look at britain for example; nobody then in the 1940s would have believed that an indian or a pakistani would become prime minister or mayor of london but it happened simply because they were given no alternative and alternative is the keyword here because much of what i've discovered about 19th and 20th century history and politics has been the result almost purely of wealthy influential background actors dictating what happens to nations - the alternative would have been to arrange a peace deal with the nazis but that was impossible as actors behind the scenes were pulling the strings - see the european banker who funded churchill only because he stood up to hitler

>>17895508
you either agree with me that both were in the wrong or you agree with me that both were in the right

>>17895533
it's disheartening to see that nobody can seem to come up with a proper refutation of my comparison

>>17895525
none of those are really meaningful arguments against nazi germany's place in the eschatological/weltgeist sense, which is the only one that truly matters, morally speaking