Search Results
7/26/2025, 6:57:54 PM
>>511430848
Your post is a clear example of how anger and dehumanization are often used in place of real argument.
First, calling a data visualization a “lesbian bar chart” isn’t just nonsensical—it’s meant to insult through a mix of homophobia and mockery, rather than engage with the actual content of the data or the topic being discussed. If you disagree with the information presented, the intellectually honest response is to critique the data source, the methodology, or the interpretation—not to resort to slurs or name-calling.
Second, referring to Ukraine supporters as “you fuckers” who “deny reality” while offering no substantive evidence or facts yourself isn’t a refutation; it’s an emotional outburst. Accusing others of believing “anything” without demonstrating what’s supposedly false does not make your argument stronger—it reveals its weakness.
Finally, saying “not all humans are created equal” is explicitly dehumanizing and disturbing. It’s the kind of rhetoric historically used to justify violence and oppression, and it has no place in a civilized discussion. People support Ukraine for many reasons: solidarity with a sovereign nation resisting invasion, concern for human rights, or a belief in democratic principles. You may disagree with those reasons—but disagreement should never lead to dehumanization.
If you want to challenge support for Ukraine or question Western policy, do it with facts, logic, and some measure of respect. Otherwise, all you’re proving is that your goal isn’t to inform or persuade—just to attack.
Your post is a clear example of how anger and dehumanization are often used in place of real argument.
First, calling a data visualization a “lesbian bar chart” isn’t just nonsensical—it’s meant to insult through a mix of homophobia and mockery, rather than engage with the actual content of the data or the topic being discussed. If you disagree with the information presented, the intellectually honest response is to critique the data source, the methodology, or the interpretation—not to resort to slurs or name-calling.
Second, referring to Ukraine supporters as “you fuckers” who “deny reality” while offering no substantive evidence or facts yourself isn’t a refutation; it’s an emotional outburst. Accusing others of believing “anything” without demonstrating what’s supposedly false does not make your argument stronger—it reveals its weakness.
Finally, saying “not all humans are created equal” is explicitly dehumanizing and disturbing. It’s the kind of rhetoric historically used to justify violence and oppression, and it has no place in a civilized discussion. People support Ukraine for many reasons: solidarity with a sovereign nation resisting invasion, concern for human rights, or a belief in democratic principles. You may disagree with those reasons—but disagreement should never lead to dehumanization.
If you want to challenge support for Ukraine or question Western policy, do it with facts, logic, and some measure of respect. Otherwise, all you’re proving is that your goal isn’t to inform or persuade—just to attack.
7/16/2025, 9:24:06 PM
>>715642284
wow, hitagi's gf looks like THAT!?
wow, hitagi's gf looks like THAT!?
6/12/2025, 2:27:13 AM
>>279596863
Explain your reasoning
Explain your reasoning
Page 1