>>149124552
>i give attention to shit content, because i refuse to acknowledge that content exists outside the 3 channels and 2 3D studios i pretend must be the center of attention.
noone outside USA gave a shit about "beanmouth" style in the first place. you decided to guzzle slop in hopes that the slop-factory will make something less slop, so you can pretend to be happy about positive change while willfully ignoring the sea of content you could have given attention instead.

>If I want a stylized 3D animated film I’d rather have films have Looney Tunes-like 2D-adjacent animation
here are two 3D movies expected to come out soon, which look like they could be mistaken for 2D animation in still images.
https://youtu.be/MMdX91qrk6U
https://youtu.be/EcvtGSiS6U4
however, they are not from Pixar or DreamWorks, so your duty is to completely ignore that i pointed this out.

>>149127457
see, we could be talking about animation people actually like, but if they don't air on CN or Nick or Disney, they are not approved for discussion on this board. despite 4chan posters claiming to be underground contrarians, you are expected to not discuss anything other than what is already popular.
>>149127924
>WHHHYYY MUST ALL WELL-KNOWN INDIE CARTOONS SUCK???
>WELL-KNOWN
thanks for proving my previous point.