Search Results
7/19/2025, 4:43:33 AM
>>64001913
>Why did you steal my pic you fucking faggot?
you kinda answered the first half of your question with your second half lol also probably a bot
>Why did you steal my pic you fucking faggot?
you kinda answered the first half of your question with your second half lol also probably a bot
7/4/2025, 2:15:05 PM
>>63937490
You're a dumbass OP. I've been advocating for removing suppressors from the NFA for a long time, I supported the first HPA in 2017, and have donated to ASA. It was a long shot to get it through reconciliation, but it still raised the political profile. And this is still a real win. The biggest way to get suppressors and SBRs removed from the NFA in a sustainable way is the same as always with laws: steadily build political momentum and support.
And the most basic way to do that is also clear: more suppressors in the hands of more people. The more owners there are, the more people see the very real benefits and realize that the hollywood fearmongering bullshit is a bunch of garbage (suppressed guns are still loud, just easier to get below the "hearing damage" level and safer/nicer for everyone else in the area), and frankly/cynically the bigger the industry gets so it can do more and more lobbying, the better the politics will get.
For that, losing the $200 floor is a big, big fucking deal. Eforms&fast approvals don't eliminate the pain, but they have reduced it a lot. And there is no inherent reason suppressors can't start at $50. The tax is the core of what forced the American market into a weird place where there is only mid to ultra high end range, nothing cheap. With that at $0, a lot of new options can open up. And psychologically, it also takes away from of the "this is a special, luxury item, so regulation makes more sense!" feel. When regular people see suppressors for $50-100 and then see all the BS around them, I think that too will niggle some noggins.
in short: don't not to be a dumb doomer faggot 100% of the time OP, maybe work to bring it down to 80% ok?
You're a dumbass OP. I've been advocating for removing suppressors from the NFA for a long time, I supported the first HPA in 2017, and have donated to ASA. It was a long shot to get it through reconciliation, but it still raised the political profile. And this is still a real win. The biggest way to get suppressors and SBRs removed from the NFA in a sustainable way is the same as always with laws: steadily build political momentum and support.
And the most basic way to do that is also clear: more suppressors in the hands of more people. The more owners there are, the more people see the very real benefits and realize that the hollywood fearmongering bullshit is a bunch of garbage (suppressed guns are still loud, just easier to get below the "hearing damage" level and safer/nicer for everyone else in the area), and frankly/cynically the bigger the industry gets so it can do more and more lobbying, the better the politics will get.
For that, losing the $200 floor is a big, big fucking deal. Eforms&fast approvals don't eliminate the pain, but they have reduced it a lot. And there is no inherent reason suppressors can't start at $50. The tax is the core of what forced the American market into a weird place where there is only mid to ultra high end range, nothing cheap. With that at $0, a lot of new options can open up. And psychologically, it also takes away from of the "this is a special, luxury item, so regulation makes more sense!" feel. When regular people see suppressors for $50-100 and then see all the BS around them, I think that too will niggle some noggins.
in short: don't not to be a dumb doomer faggot 100% of the time OP, maybe work to bring it down to 80% ok?
7/4/2025, 2:15:05 PM
>>509492567
You're a dumbass OP. I've been advocating for removing suppressors from the NFA for a long time, I supported the first HPA in 2017, and have donated to ASA. It was a long shot to get it through reconciliation, but it still raised the political profile. And this is still a real win. The biggest way to get suppressors and SBRs removed from the NFA in a sustainable way is the same as always with laws: steadily build political momentum and support.
And the most basic way to do that is also clear: more suppressors in the hands of more people. The more owners there are, the more people see the very real benefits and realize that the hollywood fearmongering bullshit is a bunch of garbage (suppressed guns are still loud, just easier to get below the "hearing damage" level and safer/nicer for everyone else in the area), and frankly/cynically the bigger the industry gets so it can do more and more lobbying, the better the politics will get.
For that, losing the $200 floor is a big, big fucking deal. Eforms&fast approvals don't eliminate the pain, but they have reduced it a lot. And there is no inherent reason suppressors can't start at $50. The tax is the core of what forced the American market into a weird place where there is only mid to ultra high end range, nothing cheap. With that at $0, a lot of new options can open up. And psychologically, it also takes away from of the "this is a special, luxury item, so regulation makes more sense!" feel. When regular people see suppressors for $50-100 and then see all the BS around them, I think that too will niggle some noggins.
in short: don't not to be a dumb doomer faggot 100% of the time OP, maybe work to bring it down to 80% ok?
You're a dumbass OP. I've been advocating for removing suppressors from the NFA for a long time, I supported the first HPA in 2017, and have donated to ASA. It was a long shot to get it through reconciliation, but it still raised the political profile. And this is still a real win. The biggest way to get suppressors and SBRs removed from the NFA in a sustainable way is the same as always with laws: steadily build political momentum and support.
And the most basic way to do that is also clear: more suppressors in the hands of more people. The more owners there are, the more people see the very real benefits and realize that the hollywood fearmongering bullshit is a bunch of garbage (suppressed guns are still loud, just easier to get below the "hearing damage" level and safer/nicer for everyone else in the area), and frankly/cynically the bigger the industry gets so it can do more and more lobbying, the better the politics will get.
For that, losing the $200 floor is a big, big fucking deal. Eforms&fast approvals don't eliminate the pain, but they have reduced it a lot. And there is no inherent reason suppressors can't start at $50. The tax is the core of what forced the American market into a weird place where there is only mid to ultra high end range, nothing cheap. With that at $0, a lot of new options can open up. And psychologically, it also takes away from of the "this is a special, luxury item, so regulation makes more sense!" feel. When regular people see suppressors for $50-100 and then see all the BS around them, I think that too will niggle some noggins.
in short: don't not to be a dumb doomer faggot 100% of the time OP, maybe work to bring it down to 80% ok?
Page 1