Search Results
5/31/2025, 11:15:20 PM
>>4431382
I was going to get a 50mm instead of the 70 200 but I do a lot of pet and nature photography and wanted a faster zoom for when I'm in a low lit building. this was taken with a 28-300 3.5-5.6 Nikon lens and as you already know, 5.6 + low matte lighting requires extra lighting.
I could take that lens along but it's af is dogshit in low light situations, I usually have to manually adjust and hope it makes the minor corrections instead of jumping around.
I was going to get a 50mm instead of the 70 200 but I do a lot of pet and nature photography and wanted a faster zoom for when I'm in a low lit building. this was taken with a 28-300 3.5-5.6 Nikon lens and as you already know, 5.6 + low matte lighting requires extra lighting.
I could take that lens along but it's af is dogshit in low light situations, I usually have to manually adjust and hope it makes the minor corrections instead of jumping around.
5/21/2025, 1:56:51 AM
I'm also quite poor so I'm working with the best DSLR I could afford (D750), the Nikon super zoom, a gen 2 90mm macro from Tamron, and I just scrimped together 300usd for a first gen Tamron 70-200 2.8 which I bought last week for my birthday
Page 1