Search Results
6/29/2025, 12:11:46 AM
>>40202968
>I’m always doing things at the behest of others, never myself.
>My dreams have been broken since a few years ago and gave way to
What were your dreams? I agree, living just for other's is an experience that can hollow you from the inside out. I wanna get to know you a little better to understand what truly would drive you.
>a simple wish to never feel the pain of trying and failing,
what kind of things have you tried where failing hurt?
>or trying and always losing out to others again.
Tell me of the times you lost out to others.
>>40203639
Oh gosh I wish I had the slightest clue but I am completely fashionless.. I think both should work fine though, a moid like me would not notice (but I know it's not the point here).
>>40206756
>>40206915
Wat makes you say that, Anon(s)?
>>40199911
>I personally just don't read footnotes tbqh
Oh I definitely enjoy a good footnote
>analytical philosophy thing... maybe you'd enjoy that... oh, and Spinoza...
It's one of those things I never made the time to get into! And Kant isn't a bad writer, just.. autistically precise. His language suffers from verbosity, really, which is why I think symbolic shorthands he could abstractly define in his usual paragraph-spanning way *once* would actually shorten his written works a lot since he could then use the same few symbols to mean the same precise things over and over. You are right though that a lot of philosophy doesn't work that way at all. Hegel I read less of, I only have vague recollections of epistemology.
(1/2)
>I’m always doing things at the behest of others, never myself.
>My dreams have been broken since a few years ago and gave way to
What were your dreams? I agree, living just for other's is an experience that can hollow you from the inside out. I wanna get to know you a little better to understand what truly would drive you.
>a simple wish to never feel the pain of trying and failing,
what kind of things have you tried where failing hurt?
>or trying and always losing out to others again.
Tell me of the times you lost out to others.
>>40203639
Oh gosh I wish I had the slightest clue but I am completely fashionless.. I think both should work fine though, a moid like me would not notice (but I know it's not the point here).
>>40206756
>>40206915
Wat makes you say that, Anon(s)?
>>40199911
>I personally just don't read footnotes tbqh
Oh I definitely enjoy a good footnote
>analytical philosophy thing... maybe you'd enjoy that... oh, and Spinoza...
It's one of those things I never made the time to get into! And Kant isn't a bad writer, just.. autistically precise. His language suffers from verbosity, really, which is why I think symbolic shorthands he could abstractly define in his usual paragraph-spanning way *once* would actually shorten his written works a lot since he could then use the same few symbols to mean the same precise things over and over. You are right though that a lot of philosophy doesn't work that way at all. Hegel I read less of, I only have vague recollections of epistemology.
(1/2)
Page 1