>>509852414
>calls that slow trickle and absolute roadblock at EVERY turn every 4-6 months as example of an "onslaught of weapons".

My dear /pol/ack...do you not remember the absolute agonizing groveling that Ukraine had to resort to just to fucking get HIMARS? Did you forget how LONG and grueling it was to get Stormshadow/SCALPs? What about F16s since the literal start of the war? It's always slow, drip feeding, while Ukraine does what it can to hold off until then.

Not a SINGLE military strategy sees that as a formula for victory. The fact that Ukraine, unironically, didn't fall in 2 weeks/3 days/1 nanosecond or whatever the memes are, is absolutely insane on a strategic level.

Either Ukraine absolutely exceeded all expectations and pulled off an insane move of defiance to surivive.

Or Russia simply turned out to be ill-equipped, ill-prepared, and unmotivated--as well as just incompetent.

Or, it's a bit of both.
Either way, this is a historic embarrassment seeing WHERE the situation is given the facts, given that its going on 4 FUCKING YEARS.