Search Results
6/10/2025, 4:28:58 PM
>>40505716
I would call "receptive" a subset of "passive".
Cuz here's the thing, AASB, active and passive are very literally the "1" and "0" that make up the universe, like computer binary.
And what that 1 and 0 also have in common with computer binary is that the 0 is LITERALLY NOTHING and is only an "existence" in any meaningful way when given context by its opposite 1/"active principle" (and in that context the principles become co-equal).
So like... I'd say that you arrive at "receptivity" once you expressive the passive principle built ATOP a certain amount of active foundation. (the active principle being necessary in some degree for there to BE a receptive "thing" to begin with).
I would call "receptive" a subset of "passive".
Cuz here's the thing, AASB, active and passive are very literally the "1" and "0" that make up the universe, like computer binary.
And what that 1 and 0 also have in common with computer binary is that the 0 is LITERALLY NOTHING and is only an "existence" in any meaningful way when given context by its opposite 1/"active principle" (and in that context the principles become co-equal).
So like... I'd say that you arrive at "receptivity" once you expressive the passive principle built ATOP a certain amount of active foundation. (the active principle being necessary in some degree for there to BE a receptive "thing" to begin with).
Page 1