Search Results
7/8/2025, 2:33:55 PM
Because it inevitably leads to nothingness, so they deliberately avoid it through elaborate word games. They fear the void. They fear the silence.
6/28/2025, 9:22:28 AM
>>24502773
TL;DR (4chan edition):
Linear time is a psyop. Makes you think you're living in THE most important era—either God-tier or end-times doom. That’s ego bait. Reality runs on cycles: rise, fall, rebirth. Your "collapse" is just the start of the next round. Cope, seethe, embrace the wheel.
TL;DR (4chan edition):
Linear time is a psyop. Makes you think you're living in THE most important era—either God-tier or end-times doom. That’s ego bait. Reality runs on cycles: rise, fall, rebirth. Your "collapse" is just the start of the next round. Cope, seethe, embrace the wheel.
6/22/2025, 7:36:18 AM
>>40578883
Buddha was wise because he understood human nature, not just in theory, but in practice. He didn’t command people to obey him blindly or claim divine authority—he observed reality as it was, without illusion, without attachment. He saw that suffering wasn’t caused by external forces or divine punishment, but by desire, clinging, and ignorance. Instead of demanding submission or promising salvation in some distant afterlife, he gave people a method to free themselves, here and now. His teachings weren’t based on prophecy or self-sacrifice but on understanding the mind, recognizing impermanence, and letting go of the very illusions that trap people in suffering. He never claimed to be a savior, never demanded worship—he simply pointed the way and let people walk the path themselves.
Compare that to other so-called “spiritual leaders” who died young, confused, and abandoned, convinced the world would be remade in their image, only to leave behind division, contradiction, and centuries of bloodshed. Where Buddha taught self-awareness, others preached blind faith. Where Buddha encouraged people to see beyond illusion, others demanded obedience to dogma. And while Buddha’s legacy is one of introspection and liberation, other religions have spent 2,000 years trying to clean up the mess left behind by their so-called messiah. One led people to understanding—the other led them to the cross.
Buddha was wise because he understood human nature, not just in theory, but in practice. He didn’t command people to obey him blindly or claim divine authority—he observed reality as it was, without illusion, without attachment. He saw that suffering wasn’t caused by external forces or divine punishment, but by desire, clinging, and ignorance. Instead of demanding submission or promising salvation in some distant afterlife, he gave people a method to free themselves, here and now. His teachings weren’t based on prophecy or self-sacrifice but on understanding the mind, recognizing impermanence, and letting go of the very illusions that trap people in suffering. He never claimed to be a savior, never demanded worship—he simply pointed the way and let people walk the path themselves.
Compare that to other so-called “spiritual leaders” who died young, confused, and abandoned, convinced the world would be remade in their image, only to leave behind division, contradiction, and centuries of bloodshed. Where Buddha taught self-awareness, others preached blind faith. Where Buddha encouraged people to see beyond illusion, others demanded obedience to dogma. And while Buddha’s legacy is one of introspection and liberation, other religions have spent 2,000 years trying to clean up the mess left behind by their so-called messiah. One led people to understanding—the other led them to the cross.
Page 1