>>510095126
>Europeans include all kinds of people who look and act differently. Same with Africa. The white/black descriptors only make sense in colonial settings.
if you name yourself a color any true difference can never be realized. The brain is a difference engine. If names are not real you can never functionally make sense of reality. I am a difference which makes a difference. We are the difference we make

>>508358927
let us entertain what would be required for your word (color) to communicate identity. We can approach this from several angles:
1. The word would have to represent only what it identifies. So not also color. If it represents one thing but also a transcendental property of something else, it is what we should call a semantical disturbance. It cannot be used as a word to orient us in a way that achieves a transcendental understanding if it also means something else
2. Color is unique in that what it signifies is something that cannot be communicated (color), so we would have to change the word so that it no longer means color.
Understand the difference in function of what these two represent. Collective identity is orienting us towards the cause of our actions (us). If this contains within it semantical disturbances, it (color), can be used as a social lever