>>81920078
>Brain scans aren't really gold standard for diagnosing BPD
>Most cases are non-severe
As per my last post, most cases are syndromes and not actual BPD.
>most mental disorders can be cured through structured treatment. The primary obstacle is dropout rate.
That could be true if you're not talking about exclusively therapy, and... "Most" my ass btw. Cases matter, not types.
>Redefining BPD to mean only the top n% most severe cases is pointless
Refutation without elaboration is what's pointless. Discarded.
>Unlikely, rumination leads to an echochamber and the reinforcement of unhealthy thought pattern
You're projecting. Introspection isn't mere rumination, and the presumption about the latter has no ground of sensibility.
>The entire point of therapy is to recognize those thoughts and move past them so you unlearn the malignant circuit. If it didn't work for you, sorry. But it works for a lot of people and the mechanism of action is the exact same as psychedelics, psych meds, transcranial, whatever the fuck.
You're arguing that convincing a person to ignore an arrow sticking from their guts is the same as removing the arrow and treating the wound. This is cultist thinking.
>Yes, it is. Lower volumes do not preclude you from learning new circuits
Utterly irrelevant pedantic retardation. You're arguing that you could, for example, optimize a 1k neuron cluster circuit to have it ignore the sensory overload when the healthy norm of the cluster is to be of 100k neurons.

C'mon, surprise me with something actually constructive. Even shittiestbtrolls can do better, if by accident.