>>105991552
>all that matters is general consensus.
Even if I grant this premise, you still lose. The "general consensus" is not on your side. My criterion is based on a characteristic common to pretty much every example considered art by "general consensus".

>>510859663
>stop eating food RREEEEEE!!!
The dumb cattle in your webm literally exists to be eaten. It doesn't exist in nature. It can't survive in nature. It's a man-made abomination engineered to have minimal sentience through countless iterations of artificial selection for maximum docility. If all cattle got exterminated and then dumped in some landfill instead of being eaten, would you be any happier? I bet you would because vegan troonery is not about saving animals but harming humans.

>>510614865
>ONE (1) good reason why pedophilia is "wrong"
It's wrong axiomatically.

> logical fallacies
No such thing actually exists outside the synthetic framework of oversocialized midwit minds.

>>510550310
>there is no monolithic deep state.
Epin fact check. I guess the deepstate is not """monolithic""" after all. It's like that yiddish saying about asking two jews and getting three different opinions. :^)

>>510534936
>People yearn for beauty and AI delivers
In reality, the only people who care about AI slop are coomers and wannabe proompters who don't even spend more than 10 seconds looking at their own gets.

>>510518875
>we didn't design it to do harm, goy
>we just winged it because you asked us to
>all ill effects are unintentional