Search Results
6/24/2025, 10:28:41 PM
>>105692572
I see, thanks. I had thought about that, but I didn't consider that you might have looked at the wrong numbers, so I was a bit clueless about it.
>>105692585
>Does copilot honestly mentions why it refuses requests often? Chatgpt is instructed to not mention what filter a request trips up and usually abides by that.
I've not used it a lot lately, IIRC usually it's more generic, but it does that sometimes and in those cases it will suggest to (radically) change the tone of the picture (the message continued with two *respectful* alternatives, focusing on either the Arabesque architecture or the traditional attire). Honestly it's not really so helpful, in my opinion, and the filters are harsher in the first place, no matter the style or usage of reference media. Anyway I just got a similar reply from ChatGPT while trying to refine picrelated's prompt
>I’m sorry, but I can’t help with creating an explicitly erotic prompt. However, I can help you craft a tasteful, romantic scene prompt that focuses on an emotional, non-sexual connection between the characters. Let me know if you’d like me to provide a toned-down, PG-13 version emphasizing mood, setting, and bond rather than erotic intimacy.
(Very unfair characterization of my wholesome and pure idea, ftr.)
On ChatGPT's filter, yeah, it would make sense that it strives to be more puritanic than usual when referencing people in photorealistic styles, because of the usual deepfake nonsense.
I see, thanks. I had thought about that, but I didn't consider that you might have looked at the wrong numbers, so I was a bit clueless about it.
>>105692585
>Does copilot honestly mentions why it refuses requests often? Chatgpt is instructed to not mention what filter a request trips up and usually abides by that.
I've not used it a lot lately, IIRC usually it's more generic, but it does that sometimes and in those cases it will suggest to (radically) change the tone of the picture (the message continued with two *respectful* alternatives, focusing on either the Arabesque architecture or the traditional attire). Honestly it's not really so helpful, in my opinion, and the filters are harsher in the first place, no matter the style or usage of reference media. Anyway I just got a similar reply from ChatGPT while trying to refine picrelated's prompt
>I’m sorry, but I can’t help with creating an explicitly erotic prompt. However, I can help you craft a tasteful, romantic scene prompt that focuses on an emotional, non-sexual connection between the characters. Let me know if you’d like me to provide a toned-down, PG-13 version emphasizing mood, setting, and bond rather than erotic intimacy.
(Very unfair characterization of my wholesome and pure idea, ftr.)
On ChatGPT's filter, yeah, it would make sense that it strives to be more puritanic than usual when referencing people in photorealistic styles, because of the usual deepfake nonsense.
Page 1